Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. McCray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 5, 1993No. 92-01415Published

1ConcurrenceParker, Judge

I concur with the majority’s result; however, I would reverse based upon the legal insufficiency of the defendant’s motion and the trial court’s failure to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190. Rule 3.190 which provides the method by which a motion to suppress evidence and an admission or confession should proceed in the trial court, states:(h) Motion to Suppress Evidence in Unlawful Search.

[[Image here]](2) Contents of Motion. Every motion to suppress evidence shall clearly state the particular evidence sought to be suppressed, the reasons for suppression and a general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HintonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Dickenson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. State v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API