Legal Opinion

ICON Development Corp. v. Winkelman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 1997No. Nos. 96-2026, 96-2052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Reversed. The trial court’s determination that our reversal in Winkelman v. Toll, 661 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), of the final judgment rendered in favor of ICON Development Corporation, disposed either directly or indirectly of all of ICON’S other affirmative defenses to the claims of compensation for condominium expenses and assessments by the Winkelmans is in error. Those affirmative defenses were neither addressed by our prior opinion nor argued in the parties’ briefs. The trial court had expressly stated in the judgment that it had become unnecessary to address those defenses in light…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. BouldSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Winkelman v. TollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. TWO M DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. MikosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bloco, Inc. v. Porterfield Oil Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Peterson v. MathiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API