Legal Opinion

Mulherin v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1907No. 56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Money rule, from city court of Richmond county — Judge Eve. February 14, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

The plaintiff in error, Mulherin, brought a rule to distribute the fund arising from the sale of certain corn which had been levied upon and sold as the property of one Frank Harris, under a common-law fi. fa. which Mulherin had obtained against him. In response to the rule, Porter and Eve intervened, and made it appear that the corn in question was subject to a lien in their favor for-rent, which was superior to Mulherin’s judgment, and that distress warrants had been sworn out for this rent and had been placed in the sheriff’s hands for the purpose of claiming the proceeds. In addition to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fulghum v. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Behn & Foster v. Willam H. Young & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  3. Craigmiles v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Green, Tracy & Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  5. Georgia Chemical Works v. CartledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baisden & Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Ford v. Lone Star Cement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Hill-Atkinson Co. v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Moore v. CofieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Northwest Atlanta Bank v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API