Legal Opinion

Avon Tape, Inc. v. Shuman

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 27, 2004No. 040068BLSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, J.

This matter is before the Court on a motion by the defendants-in-counterclaim Avon Tape, Inc. (“Avon”) and American Shoe Shank Co., Inc. (“American Shoe”), and the third-party defendant, Howard D. Shuman (“Howard”), seeking summary judgment on the “counterclaims” brought against them by the defendant, Stephen J. Shuman (“Stephen”).3 There are six counts in the amended counterclaim: Count I for breach of fiduciary duty; Count II for an accounting; Count III for conversion; Count IV for violation of G.L.c. 93A; CountV for a declaratory judgment; and Count VI for breach of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Zimmerman v. BogoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API