Legal Opinion
Feinstein v. Ritter
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 7, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Philip Feinstein against William C. Ritter and Deo Ritter. Judgment for plaintiff on directed verdict, and defendants appeal. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff herein has recovered a judgment upon the direction of a verdict in an action wherein he alleges that:
“The plaintiff, at the special instance, and request of the defendant, duly sold and delivered to the defendants certain goods, wares, and merchandise for which defendants promised and agreed to pay, and which were of the agreed price and reasonable value of the sum of $996.04.”
The defendants’ answer consists of a general denial, without affirmative defenses. At the trial it appeared practically without contradiction that the defendants had in fact bought goods of the value of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milliken v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Nicoll v. . BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Moore v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Kelly Asphalt Block Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hudgins Produce Co. v. J. R. Beggs & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Hudgins Produce Co. v. J. R. Beggs & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916