Legal Opinion · Concurrence

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. San Diego Congress of Racial Equality

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1966No. Civ. 7650Published

1ConcurrenceCoughlin, J.

I concur, but deem it advisable to note that the modification of the injunction deleting therefrom restrictions upon the language defendants may use in picketing signs, posters, placards or slogans is not an authorization to use language the object of which is to effect quota hiring. Where the object of picketing is unlawful, the picketing is unlawful, and may be enjoined. (Northwestern Pac. R.R. Co. v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers’ Union, 31 Cal.2d 441, 445-446 [189 P.2d 277]; Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International etc. of Teamsters, 27 Cal.2d 599, 603 [165 P.2d 891, 162 A.L.R. 1426].)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hughes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Chrisman v. Culinary Workers' Local No. 62California Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API