Legal Opinion

Klein v. Adams Express Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On rule to show cause why the writs of summons and the •service thereof should be quashed.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

It appears by the ex parte affidavits upon which the rules to show cause were allowed that the Adams Express Company, the defendant, is a joint stock association organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that •the principal place of business is in the city of New York, and that it had a president and treasurer, and that under the laws of the State of New York actions are authorized to be brought against the president or treasurer, and that the statute of the State of New York directs the service of process in such actions so…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peer v. BloxhamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Eastwood v. RussellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API