Legal Opinion

Beahm v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. 33833PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The instant action is before this Court upon the appeal of Charles and Kathryn Beahm, Randy and Kathy Johnson, and the Jefferson City Council on Aging [hereinafter “Appellants”] from a January 4, 2007, order granting defendants’, 7-Eleven, Inc. and Melissa Spinks [hereinafter “Appellees”], Motion for Summary Judgment. On appeal, the Appellants allege that errors were committed by the circuit court when it applied the doctrines of res judicata and/or claim preclusion to the instant action, and when the circuit court held that Appellants suffered no recoverable damages. Conversely, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Conley v. SpillersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dan Ryan Builders, Inc. v. Crystal Ridge Development, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Fareed v. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Baker v. The Chemours Company FC, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Beahm v. 7-Eleven, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Eric W. Miller v. Terry D. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API