State v. Gawlas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Judge.
In this case the trial court granted the defendant an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 9, to permit review of an order denying the defendant’s pretrial discovery motion. Because we hold that a criminal defendant *75may not appeal such an order on an interlocutory basis, we disallow the Rule 9 motion and remand the case for further proceedings in the trial court.
The current controversy arose when the defendant filed a pretrial motion in the trial court to compel the State to disclose the identity of a confidential informant mentioned…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TeelTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HuskeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Kenneth Weems v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher Lee FaulknerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2026
- State of Tennessee v. Dusan SimicCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.