Union Consolidated Mining Co. v. Raht
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an order made at Special Term vacating an attachment, in an action in which the complaint contained several causes of action, only one of which justified the issuing of an attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, P. J.:
The court at Special Term vacated the attachment because several of the causes of action stated in the complaint are causes for which a warrant of attachment cannot issue under the Code. If the Special Term was right in this conclusion, it is unnecessary *209to examine any of tbe other questions raised on the appeal. The amended complaint contains several causes of action, the most material, and all but one of which, are for the alleged misconduct and fraud of the defendant Julius E. Raht, in the management of the affairs of the plaintiffs as their agent, and for the conspiracy of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawton v. KielNew York Supreme Court · 1868
- McGovern v. PaynNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. McLoonNew York Supreme Court · 1866