Legal Opinion
(PC) Cappello v. Stohl
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 17, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01365Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MARK W. CAPPELLO, Case No: 1:24-cv-01365-EPG 10 11 Plaintiff, F R I E N C D O IN M G M S E A N N D D IN R G E T C H O A M T M T E H N IS D A A T C I T O I N O S N 12 v. P A R G O A C IN E S E T D D O E N F P E L N A D I A N N T T IF S F T ’S O C H L L A , IM ODONAUGHY, AND BRAGG FOR 13 DONALD STOHL, et al., VIOLATION OF THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT 14 Defendants. BASED ON ALLEGEDLY PREVENTING PLAINTIFF FROM OBTAINING HIS 15 MEALS AT THE TIMES DICTATED BY HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, AS WELL AS 16…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.