Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1866PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The first, error complained of by the appellant is that the court wrongly instructed the jury as to what constituted larceny. East,-in his Pleas of the Crown, defines larceny to be the wrongful or fraudulent taking or carrying away by any person of the mere personal goods of another, from any place, with a felonious intent to convert them to his (the taker’s) own use, and make them his own property, without the consent of the owner. Bishop says, it is the taking and removing, by trespass, of personal property, known to belong either generally or specially to another, with the intent to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. State v. BruinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. State v. DaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  3. State v. RichmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. State v. CarraginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API