In re Boneta

OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with two allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained both charges based upon the respondent’s failure to interpose an answer to the petition or to appear at the scheduled hearing before the Special Referee.

Charge One alleged that the respondent failed to comply with the lawful demands of the petitioner in connection with its investigations into allegations of professional misconduct. By letter dated March 31, 1993, the respondent was advised that the petitioner Grievance Committee had received a…