Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Hart v. Gleeson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1937No. 26355. En BancPublished

1DissentGeraghty, J.

(dissenting) — I am constrained to dissent from the majority opinion.

The statutory mandate for payment by the counties of pensions to blind persons is conditioned and limited by the terms of chapter 102, Laws of 1933, p. 420, § 9, as amended by chapter 106, Laws of 1935, p. 262, § 7, reading:

“In addition to the other tax levies by such county, the board of county commissioners shall also levy a tax of one-fifth of one mill on each dollar of assessed value of the property of the county, to be levied and collected in the same manner provided for the assessment and collection of other taxes for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Robbins v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API