Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. Hughes
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1998No. 970166Published
1Opinion of the Court
969 P.2d 409 (1998)
Maxcine ARCHULETA, Plaintiff and Petitioner,
v.
Donald C. HUGHES, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 970166.
Supreme Court of Utah.
October 2, 1998.
J. Kelly Walker, Richard K. Glauser, Salt Lake City, for petitioner on appeal.
Donald C. Hughes, pro se.
On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
This case comes before us on a writ of certiorari to the court of appeals. The petitioner, Maxcine Archuleta, argues that the court of appeals erred in upholding the trial court's denial of Archuleta's motions (a) to amend her complaint to conform to the evidence,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Griva v. DavisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sommers v. McKinneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.