Drake v. Stout (Et Al.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien on defendant’s property. The premises were later sold by the sheriff. Following the sheriff’s sale, appellant, who was a judgment creditor of defendant and who had intervened, moved to have plaintiff’s lien stricken off. The rule was discharged and this appeal followed. After the appeal was taken, but before it was filed in the lower court, the plaintiff-appellee induced the sheriff to pay him the amount of his claim, and he marked the lien satisfied.
The appeal cannot be considered for three reasons, each of which is fatal: (1) Because appellant…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Knoell v. CareySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Knoell v. CareySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Kessler v. Mandel Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Knoell v. Carey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1927
- Knoell v. Carey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.