Church v. Darch
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
Harold Darch and Corbett Church own adjoining parcels of land. Darch filed suit against Church to resolve a dispute as to the boundary line. After a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of Darch and ordered Church to restore the disputed property to its condition before he had encroached thereon. Church appeals from that order.
1. Church contends that the trial court erred in finding that the parties agreed that it was impossible to establish a boundary line from the “Philbrick” plat, which plat was used as the legal description by a common grantor. Although there does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeKalb County v. Georgia Paperstock Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Ward v. NATIONAL DAIRY &C. CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Empire Banking Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Purcell v. C. Goldstein & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Carter v. ParsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wender & Roberts, Inc. v. WenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Holloway v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- INVESTMENT PROPERTIES CO., INC. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Savannah Jaycees Foundation, Inc. v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Youngblood v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.