Committee for a Rickel Alternative v. City of Linden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
111 N.J. 192 (1988)
543 A.2d 943
COMMITTEE FOR A RICKEL ALTERNATIVE AND LINDEN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
CITY OF LINDEN, DEFENDANT, AND SUPERMARKETS GENERAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 15, 1987.
Decided July 25, 1988.
Charles N. Winetsky argued the cause for appellant (Winetsky and Winetsky, attorneys).
Jerome Krueger, City Attorney, argued the cause on behalf of City of Linden.
Robert M. Rich argued the cause for respondents Committee for a Rickel Alternative, et al. (Weitzman & Rich, attorneys).
Frederick G. Stickel, III,…
Also in this document: Concurrence · O'Hern; Concurrence · O'Hern.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.