Legal Opinion

Committee for a Rickel Alternative v. City of Linden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 N.J. 192 (1988)

543 A.2d 943

COMMITTEE FOR A RICKEL ALTERNATIVE AND LINDEN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

CITY OF LINDEN, DEFENDANT, AND SUPERMARKETS GENERAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 15, 1987.

Decided July 25, 1988.

Charles N. Winetsky argued the cause for appellant (Winetsky and Winetsky, attorneys).

Jerome Krueger, City Attorney, argued the cause on behalf of City of Linden.

Robert M. Rich argued the cause for respondents Committee for a Rickel Alternative, et al. (Weitzman & Rich, attorneys).

Frederick G. Stickel, III,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · O'Hern; Concurrence · O'Hern.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API