Legal Opinion

Sangster v. Van Heck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 1976No. 76-26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The minor plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries and his father sought recovery of necessary medical costs. After a 2-day trial the cause was submitted to the jury, with appropriate verdict forms and a special interrogatory submitted by defendant. The interrogatory asked whether the minor plaintifFs contributory negligence was a proximate cause of his injury. The parties then waived their rights to be present and to poll the jury when it would return with a verdict, and that the jury should be discharged when it delivered its sealed verdict to the clerk. Later, after the jury had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sommese v. Maling Bros., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Roadruck v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Haywood v. Swift & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Saavedra v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Pickett v. HandyColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sangster v. Van HeckeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Dessauer v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API