Legal Opinion

Marr v. City of Columbia

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 21, 1993No. 2033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Appellant, City of Columbia, filed a Form 21 to stop payment of workers’ compensation benefits to respondent, William Marr, asserting Marr had reached maximum medical improvement. The single commissioner found the City failed to establish entitlement to stop payment. He further found Marr was entitled to a higher compensation rate, that the City was responsible for all of Marr’s medical care and that temporary total disability benefits should continue “so long as [Marr] is actively enrolled and progressing normally” in a vocational rehabilitation program. The full commission and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Rice ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Marr v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API