Legal Opinion

United States v. Schlesinger

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 18, 2005No. Cr. 02-485(ADS)(ALL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This case involves charges of conspiracy to commit insurance fraud and creditor fraud, and arson. On October 1, 2003, a grand jury entered a 34 count Superseding Indictment (“Indictment”) against defendants Nat Sehlesinger (“Sehlesinger”), Herman Niederman (“Niederman”), and Goodmark Industries, Inc. (“Goodmark”) (collectively the “Defendants”), arising out of, among other things, a series of fires dating back to 1987 that occurred at a factory in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn. Presently before the Court are the following motions by…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Hayon v. ReardonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API