Big Four Crane Service, Inc. v. Owl Construction Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, Judge.
We have supplied a motion to dismiss the present appeal of Big Four Crane Service, Inc. in its suit against Owl Construction Company because there is no final judgment from which to appeal. We now dismiss Big Four’s appeal.
Big Four sued Owl seeking a money judgment for services rendered defendant, and a writ of sequestration seizing a crane owned by Owl and allegedly hauled by Big Four, contending a hauler’s lien attached by virtue of LSA-R.S. 9:4601. A writ of sequestration was issued. Owl furnished a bond to have its crane released, and filed a rule to have the writ of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Spiers v. RoyeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mace Scott Enterprises, Inc. v. Doug Cook Enterprises, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Pesson v. DieterichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Big Four Crane Service, Inc. v. Owl Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Big Four Crane Service, Inc. v. Owl Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.