Legal Opinion

State v. Neulander

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 18, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

801 A.2d 255 (2002)

173 N.J. 193

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff,

v.

Fred NEULANDER, Defendant-Respondent. In re Application of Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 25, 2002.

Decided July 18, 2002.

Warren W. Faulk argued the cause for appellant (Brown & Connery, attorneys).

Dennis Wixted argued the cause for respondent (Sufrin Zucker Steinberg Waller & Wixted, attorneys).

Thomas J. Cafferty argued the cause for amici curiae, The New Jersey Press Association, The Newspaper Association of America, Advance Publications, Inc., The New York Times…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API