Legal Opinion

Williamstown Township v. Hudson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2015No. Docket No. 321306PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Jeremiah Hudson, appeals as of right the trial court’s order holding that his family farm constitutes a nuisance per se and enjoining his farming operations, Sweet Peas Farms. On appeal, Hudson argues that the Right to Farm Act (RTFA), MCL 286.471 et seq., shielded his family farm from conflicting local zoning ordinances and that the trial *279court erroneously evaluated the credibility of his evidence in determining otherwise. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts of this case stretch back to August 2012 when Hudson and his family moved into their current…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Samuel D Begola Services, Inc. v. Wild Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Willoughby v. LehrbassMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Slater v. Ann Arbor Public Schools Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Krass v. Tri-County Security, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 2 Crooked Creek LLC v. Cass County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Barbara Kindig v. Harry N Herkowitz MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Basem Komis v. Kimberly R Basehart-GaetanoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Denisha Light v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Department of Environmental Quality v. Hernan F GomezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API