Legal Opinion

In Re Tobacco Litigation

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2004No. 31157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, we are asked to review a jury’s verdict declining to require the manufacturers of certain tobacco-containing products to provide medical monitoring to individuals who were significantly exposed to the potentially harmful effects of smoking. As set forth below, we affirm a trial court order that upholds the jury’s verdict.

I

This appeal involves a class action by certain West Virginia residents (hereinafter “appellants”) against several manufacturers of *479tobacco-containing cigarettes (hereinafter “appellees”), alleging that those products were defective. Because of their exposure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. DerrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sanders v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bower v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  2. Sydenstricker v. MohanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Martinsburg v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pipemasters, Inc. v. Putnam County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Tobacco LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API