Legal Opinion

Succession of Gusman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1883No. 8794PublishedCited by 5 opinions

A PPEAL from the Seventeenth District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge. Sherburne, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

The facts relating to this controversy are substantially as follows:

On the 25th of September, 1882, Mrs. Z. E. Hearsey and husband filed an application in the District Court of the Parish of East Baton Rouge, for the probate of the last will of Mrs. Theatiste P. Gusmau, *405and for their appointment as dative executors, no executors being named in tbe will.

The District Judge, after fixing a day for the probating of the will, ordered that the application of the parties to be appointed executors be advertised for ten days. The will was probated on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. M'CloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thibodaux v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Succession of WeinckeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Dixon v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Succession of ToddLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Succession of CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API