Legal Opinion

Stern v. Commissioner (A)

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 17, 1926No. Docket No. 19377Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARL STERN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Stern v. Commissioner (A)

Docket No. 19377.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

5 B.T.A. 871; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2761;

December 17, 1926, Promulgated

Carl Stern pro se.

W. F. Gibbs, Esq., for the respondent.

LITTLETON

LITTLETON: The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $688.45 for the calendar year 1923. Petitioner claims that this deficiency is incorrect in so far as it results from the disallowance by the Commissioner of a loss of $7,134.88 on German marks and German Government bonds.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Petitioner is a resident of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murchison Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  2. Appeal of BirdUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. Stern v. Commissioner (A)United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API