Legal Opinion
In re the City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1942Published
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
The jurisdictional requirements in the acquisition of real property for the widening of East 135th street for the westerly approach to the Triborough bridge, borough of the Bronx, were properly complied with.
The Board of Estimate and Apportionment on October 20, 1936, authorized the taking in fee of the real property required for'the extension and widening of East 135th street for the use of the public, and approved a rule map including, among others, a parcel designated “ Parcel F,” a strip of land running across the Mott Haven canal on the northerly side of East 135th street. This was done…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Matter of City of New York (Exterior St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Matter of City of New York (Rockaway Beach)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Merriman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.