Legal Opinion

Motown Productions, Inc. v. Cacomm, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 20, 1988No. 780, Docket 87-7917PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 11”) requires that sanctions be imposed upon an attorney who advocates a position even though it is “patently clear that [the position] has absolutely no chance of success under the existing precedents, and ... no reasonable argument can be advanced to extend, modify or reverse the law as it stands....” Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 243, 254 (2d Cir.1985). In a trademark case, section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), (“Section 35”) provides for an award of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. Majestic Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Securities Industry Ass'n v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API