Legal Opinion

City of Hendersonville v. Salvation Army

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Aside from court costs, the plaintiff City of Hender-sonville has no pecuniary interest in the outcome of this proceeding. The land which it purchased at the foreclosure sale has been sold and conveyed to McFadden and wife. If the title acquired by them should prove invalid, they have no recourse on the City. Wilmington v. Merrick, 234 N.C. 46, 65 S.E. 2d 373; Turpin v. Jackson County, 225 N.C. 389, 35 S.E. 2d 180. Accordingly, the McFaddens are now the real parties in interest. Yet they were neither pleaded into the case nor given notice of the proceeding -below.

In this state of the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doyle v. . Brown, GuardianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Harrison v. . HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API