Legal Opinion

King v. United Distributing of Texas, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1971No. 17536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

Appellee sued on open account, verified pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 185, Vernon’s Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and when the defendant answered by general denial only appellee moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 166-A, T.R.C.P. The defendant then amended his answer to include certain affirmative defenses. This amended answer was sworn to by the defendant’s attorney “to the best of his knowledge and belief.” Appellee’s motion for summary judgment was sustained.

The defendant says on appeal that this judgment should be reversed because: (1) his pleadings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hudnall v. Tyler Bank and Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Akins v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Solar v. PeterssonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Hill v. Floating Decks of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Jeffrey v. Larry Plotnick Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Brown v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Dameris v. Homestead BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API