Bissel v. Continental Trust Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Aureal from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district. !
1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, P. J.
It appears from the record that one Eugene V. U. Bissell, the husband of the plaintiff, being a member of the firm of E. Bissell, Son & Co., on April 1, 1896, transferred to his father all his right, title and interest in said copartnership, receiving from the latter as the consideration for such sale the sum of $11,000, which was evidenced by eleven promissory notes for the sum of $1,000 each, maturing at different dates covering a long period of years, and upon which interest was to be paid in the meantime. On or about 'the 7th day of April of said year, a deed of trust bearing date on said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Camp v. . SearleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Husted v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Lees v. HaydenNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Jeffres v. CochraneNew York Supreme Court · 1867
- Kahn v. Brooklyn Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reade v. Continental Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899