Legal Opinion

Hourani v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2007No. 05-2724UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Dani Hourani appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, in which he alleged that the district court misunderstood the nature of the issue presented and, therefore, ruled incorrectly on Hourani’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that he raised in his original § 2255 motion. After the district court denied the motion as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion, Hourani sought and received a certificate of appealability from this court. Because Hourani’s Rule 60(b) motion asserts a claim, it is a second or successive § 2255 motion, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. In Re Jonathan Sims, Janice v. TerbushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Alexander Ovalle (94-1566) John Ovalle, Jr. (94-2044) Benito S. Canales (94-2100) Nicholas A. Garcia (94-2263)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Ronald Post v. Margaret BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re Larry Nailor, Movant. Larry Nailor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. LudwickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  2. Simmons v. ShartleDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. United States of America v. Linnell Richmond, Jr.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API