Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson (Ex parte Wilson)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 2018No. 1160101Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Randolph G. Wilson, Jr. ("the husband"), petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment denying his motion to modify his alimony obligations. Wilson v. Wilson, 262 So.3d 1192 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). We reverse and remand.

I. Proceedings Below

The husband and Teresa L. Wilson ("the wife") were divorced in April 2004. Among other things, the divorce judgment awarded the wife $1,250 per month in periodic alimony. In August 2013, the husband commenced an action in which he sought to modify…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Rogers Foundation Repair, Inc. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API