In re the Probate of the Will of Satterlee
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFroessel, J.
In this second trial of this vigorously contested probate proceeding, while a jury has found that the decedent had testamentary capacity, and that the execution of the alleged will offered for probate and the nomination therein of Sol A. Rosenblatt as one of the executors were not procured by the undue influence of said Rosenblatt or of one Dr. Hoffmann, they could not agree, after more than 15 hours of deliberation, that the clause giving the entire residuary estate to said Rosenblatt was not so procured. Mr. Rosenblatt is an attorney; he met decedent about the middle of December, 1947. Dr.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Claim of Raymond v. Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In Re the Probate of the Will of HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- McKenna v. MeehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of BoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.