Legal Opinion

Crosby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 1988No. 87-495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in the hold up of a convenience store. He appeals his departure sentence.

The first ground given for departure, “psychological trauma inflicted,” is not a valid reason in this case because such trauma is inherent in both crimes, and there was no record evidence that the victims suffered from a discernible physical manifestation resulting from the trauma. State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla.1987). The second reason, “an utter [or flagrant] disregard for the welfare, safety, and property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Scurry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Thorne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Brawn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Beceiro-Mesa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API