Crosby v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in the hold up of a convenience store. He appeals his departure sentence.
The first ground given for departure, “psychological trauma inflicted,” is not a valid reason in this case because such trauma is inherent in both crimes, and there was no record evidence that the victims suffered from a discernible physical manifestation resulting from the trauma. State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla.1987). The second reason, “an utter [or flagrant] disregard for the welfare, safety, and property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Scurry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Thorne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Welch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Brawn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Beceiro-Mesa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988