Fortunato v. Murray
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*948The mother’s arguments concerning custody of the parties’ daughter have been rendered academic, as the daughter has reached the age of majority (see Almeda v Hopper, 2 AD3d 471 [2003]; Belsky v Belsky, 172 AD2d 576 [1991]; Berk v Berk, 170 AD2d 564, 565 [1991]).
Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s denial of her petition to vacate an order awarding residential custody of the parties’ youngest son to the father or modify the order so as to award her residential custody had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167 [1982]; Matter of Gant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Galanos v. GalanosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Belsky v. BelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Almeda v. HopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Berk v. BerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Kripfgans v. KripfgansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014