Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Brodie

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

An action cannot be referred, except by consent of parties, merely because the trial of it will require proof of various small items of damage. To justify a compulsory reference, the trial must involve “the examination of a long account on either side,” according to the ordinary acceptation of the word account.

The only fact which authorizes a compulsory reference is the same, under the Code, as when the Revised Statutes alone gave the power to refer. (2 R. S. 384, § 40; Code, § 211, sub. 1; 19 Wend. 31; 25 id. 681; 6 id. 603; Van Rensselaer and others v. Jewett, 6 Hill, 313.) This case is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Livingston v. Albany Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McLean v. East River InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API