Legal Opinion

Khasin v. R. C. Bigelow, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 12, 2015No. Case No. 12-cv-02204-WHOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING DISPUTE OVER DISCOVERY OF PROFITS

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Alex Khasin alleges that defendant R.C. Bigelow Inc. made false health claims by promoting the presence of antioxidants -in its tea products and claiming associated health benefits. The parties have filed a joint letter disputing Khasin’s entitlement to discovery of Bigelow’s profits and costs.- Dkt. No. 96. Khasin argues that “[a]s long as a theory of recovery of unjust enrichment is present in the case, Plaintiff is allowed to seek some percentage of Defendant’s net profits as a remedy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trazo v. Nestlé USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API