Kampsen v. County of Kandiyohi
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
The issue posed by this case is whether one who possesses personal property owned by another, converts the latter’s property by retaining it and ultimately selling it to satisfy a claimed lien without first taking steps reasonably designed to provide notification to the owner of the intent to foreclose the claimed lien. By granting the possessor summary judgment^ the trial court, in effect, held that the possessor as a matter of law had provided adequate notification. That holding was vacated by the court of appeals and the case remanded to the trial court for trial of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hildegarde, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Borg & Powers Furniture Co. v. ReilingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Kampsen v. County of KandiyohiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Third Party v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., Third Party Minnesota, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Bradley v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Estate of SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.