Roth v. Ross
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DONOHUE, J.:
Eileen Roth (“Roth”) appeals from the July 5, 2013 judgment entered by the Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County. Specifically, she challenges the trial court’s May 7, 2013 denial of her request for delay damages on the $20,000 allocated by the jury toward her future medical expenses, which ruling limited the damages eligible for delay damages to the $40,000 awarded for past pain and suffering. After careful review of this issue of first impression, we conclude that the trial court erred when it refused to add delay damages to the award for future medical expenses. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Midwest Financial Acceptance Corp. v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Anchorstar v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bensinger v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. SpivakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Spencer, K. v. Johnson C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Deutsche Bank National Trust v. Taggart, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Glasgow, A. v. Ducan, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.