Legal Opinion

Rohm v. Stroud

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1971No. Docket 9980Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Mich. App. 257 (1971)

192 N.W.2d 388

ROHM

v.

STROUD

Docket No. 9980.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 27, 1971.

Sauer & Girard, for plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Joseph B. Bilitzke and Carl K. Carlsen, Assistants Attorney General, for defendants.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and BRONSON and O'HARA,[*] JJ.

Affirmed by Supreme Court, 386 Mich 693.

BRONSON, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court sitting without a jury in which plaintiff was awarded a verdict of $23,869, including $8,400 for the parents' investment in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wycko v. GnodtkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Rohm v. StroudMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Benson v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Haupt v. Yale Rubber CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API