Legal Opinion

Steele v. Midwest Haulers, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1943No. 29241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The sole question actually presented by counsel is procedural. Was the defendant receiver required to file an appeal bond in the Municipal Court in order to perfect an appeal to the Court •of Common Pleas?

The record in this case is so confused as to obscure the question the court is asked to consider. For example, counsel for the defendant receiver concedes that the appeal bond was ineffective since it was not filed within the ten-day period provided by Section 1579-310, General Code, relating to the Municipal Court of Toledo; but he states that he and the other ■defendant were in error in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saslaw v. WeissOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Midway Lumber, Inc. v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API