Legal Opinion

Pops & Estrin, P. C. v. Reliance Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 5, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Walter B. Tolub, J.

Plaintiff and defendant move and cross-move for summary judgment. At issue is whether the plaintiff may recover from defendant insurer attorney’s fees which are allegedly owed by plaintiff’s former client. For the reasons discussed below this *148court finds that it may not and awards summary judgment in favor of the defendant.

The facts herein are undisputed. Plaintiff is a law firm that was retained in 1981 by one Shirley Jacobs to commence a lawsuit for personal injuries arising as a result of an automobile accident. In connection with this lawsuit, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re HausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Massapequa General Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceNew York District Court · 1983
  4. Rachlin v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hausen v. DavisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API