Legal Opinion

Brogan v. MacKlin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 16, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

From the complaint, it appears that the plaintiff was appointed by the Court of Probate, for the district of New London, administrator of the estate of Emily M. Cross, deceased, and brought the present suit in that capacity. The defendant is the administrator duly appointed by the Orphans’ Court of the County of Howard, State of Maryland, of the estate of John H. Cross, deceased, who died a resident of Baltimore. It is alleged that while riding in an automobile, owned and operated by John H. Cross, the plaintiff’s decedent, Emily M. Cross, due to the negligent manner in which the vehicle was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Diblasi v. DiblasiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Household International, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  2. Knoop v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1947
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. S.B. Phillips Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  4. Harris v. Owens, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Fazio ex rel. Fazio v. American Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API