Legal Opinion

Scahill v. Drzewucki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1935Published

1Dissent

Sears, P. J. (dissenting).

The petitioner held a position, that of a school mechanic in the civil service of the State. The basic question is whether the position was held by petitioner legally or whether because of absence of compliance with constitutional and *535statutory provisions the position was held only de facto. According to the prevailing opinion the petitioner held his position legally. It is my view that the position was held only de facto.

The civil service provision of the State Constitution, article V, section 6, is all-embracing and self-executing. (People ex rel. McClelland v.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. McClelland v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. Sweet v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Matter of KeymerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Peo. Ex Rel. Hannan v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. People ex rel. Schelpp v. KnoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API