Legal Opinion

In Re Blair

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1992No. 91-SP-699PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

Walter Blair, having passed the bar examination in 1987, is an applicant for admission to the Bar. Because adverse information regarding his fitness to practice law was presented to the Committee on Admissions (“the Committee”), it held hearings to determine whether Blair should be admitted to the Bar. At the conclusion of those hearings, the Committee was evenly divided on whether to recommend admission. We have reviewed the record, and we conclude that a remand is necessary since the recommendations provided by the Committee are insufficient to permit us to determine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In Re BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BlairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re WellsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re WellsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API