Rutland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
on rehearing.
November 3,1920.
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
During the last term of this court an opinion was rendered affirming the judgment herein. A vigorous motion for rehearing has been filed and ably presented to this court by brief and oral argument.
The main contention by appellant is that he was deprived of a fair and correct charge on the law of perfect self-defense. As we understand this record the court’s charge to the jury was more than favorable, and if there was error, such error as may have been committed was in his favor in submitting the issue of perfect self-defense in any form.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Roe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.