Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Peasley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1924No. 18065PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The plaintiff, Arnold, by this action sought to recover upon a promissory nóte secured by a crop mortgage upon certain wheat, and to obtain a judgment against the defendant Washington Wheat Growers Association for the value of the mortgaged wheat, which, it is alleged, it had received and converted.

It appears that the note was for one thousand dollars and interest, was executed by defendants Peasley and wife on November 20, 1920, due oné year after date, and payable to the order of the defendant Nash. The mortgage was of the same date and covered two-thirds of the crop to be grown by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Arbuthnot v. Richheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller & Barnhardt v. Gulf & Atlantic Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Ankeny v. Pomeroy Grain Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Union State Bank of Wapato v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Peurifoy, Receiver v. MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Pacific Coast Elevator Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API