Legal Opinion

McGuckin v. Kline

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1879Published

Bill to foreclose. On exceptions to master’s reports sustaining exceptions to answers for impertinence.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill states in substance that Edmund B. MeGuckin, •on the 23d of April, 1860, was indebted to James B. MeGuckin in the sum of $2,000, for money lent and adyanced; that, in order to secure payment thereof, the former gave to che latter a deed of that date for an undivided third owned by him of certain land and premises described in the bill; that the deed, though absolute on its face, was intended for a mortgage; that it was acknowledged and was recorded as a deed on the 25th of April, 1860; that ¡afterwards, Edmund B. MeGuckin, he being still the owner in fee of the third…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woods v. MorrellNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of MethotNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1916
  3. Desplaces v. GorisNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  4. Jolly v. CarterNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API